Windows XP User? You are an Outcast

0 Comments
[yasr_overall_rating] [yasr_visitor_votes]




Yes, that’s the feeling I am getting now being a Windows XP user myself. Despite the fact that I am using World’s most popular operating system, I am more and more getting the feeling that I belong to a clan which is looked down upon.

It is not that I got up today morning and somehow got this feeling (that did happen a bit, though), this feeling had been building up for quite some time now. But today was the day when someone hit the final nail in the coffin.

Now, you might be wondering who might be responsible for causing this feeling. Let me assure you this has nothing to do with Mac vs. PC ads. In fact, I got a sense of “patriotism” in Microsoft when I watched I am a PC ads.

Despite all this, you might be surprised to hear that these feelings have been inflicted in me by none other than Microsoft itself. Surprised? Read on.

Till a few years back, Microsoft was quite notorious about making software that serve needs of business community more, and not many decent free software came out of Microsoft’s stable. However, Microsoft bulged to the competition from tons of freeware, and came out with some really good software like Microsoft Security Essentials, Windows Live suite, and of course, Bing. I am a regular user of all of these, and enthusiastically write about many of these on this blog of mine. Again, these great free software from Microsoft further increased my attachment with Microsoft.

And then something went wrong.

Microsoft somehow decided that it will not let most of its Windows users enjoy its free software. It is a known fact that every two out of three Windows running PCs run Windows XP. So, we are Microsoft’s biggest users. Still, by some virtue infused in Microsoft by some stupid executive (as if on payrolls of Apple / Google/ Firefox), Microsoft decided to remove support for XP in latest version of its free software.

First they launched beta of Windows Live, and openly denied any support for XP. Instead, they ask you to upgrade to Windows 7 to use latest version of Windows Live. Really? Microsoft – are you so stupid to think that I would upgrade to Windows 7 just to use Windows Live?

And now, they launched IE9 beta yesterday. And guess what – it does not works on XP. Instead, you are again asked to upgrade to Windows 7. Seriously – Microsoft, how stupid can you be? Do you really think you would be able to tempt people into upgrading to Window 7 just to use IE9? My advice – fire the executive who is giving you this advice.

In all this stupidity of Microsoft, who really gets to gain? All its competitors. For example, Firefox and Opera recently came out with their newest versions, and both work on XP. There are some features that they disable on XP, because they can’t work on XP. However, you are still allowed to use all other features.

Microsoft is already losing the browser war, with its competitors gaining ground constantly. So, I would think that Microsoft would try to explore uncharted territories to expand user base of IE. Other browsers are already doing that – Firefox, Opera, Chrome work on all the OS. And Microsoft, in a stroke of genius, decides to not support its own browser on its own operating system!

I will reiterate again – IE9 is not something I would shun my XP for. I have used Windows 7 (was one of those who got Steve Ballmer signed Windows 7 DVD), and love it. But, I love XP as well. IE9 is touted to be fast, but am I really craving for fastness that much? The real bottleneck in my browsing speed is always my internet connection, and not how fast my browser can render my pages. If my browser starts rendering pages 1 second faster, do I really care? And even if I do, what is stopping me from moving to latest versions of IE competitors – all of whom work perfectly fine on XP.

Microsoft – you need to get your common sense back. You do not gain anything by shutting out two thirds of your users. Even the biggest corporations are still using XP (and many of them still on IE6). I have been one of the avid fans of Microsoft, and let me assure you, you have done a pretty good job of pissing me off, and tempting me into exploring other free and better options that welcome me with both hands, instead of making me feel like an outcast.

[yasr_overall_rating]
[yasr_visitor_votes]
Free/Paid: Free

Leave A Reply

What do you think?
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
13 Comments
  • Latest
  • Oldest
  • Hottest
Anon2011-06-20

To be honest, it’s time to get rid of XP, as someone said, XP was released a decade ago, stop complaining and upgrade and you won’t face these problems. If not, use linux it’s free and updates are free, the software is free etc.

jul2010-11-17

Let’s keep it simple:

No need to upgrade OS when your current machine works fine. Especially because it is old, it runs smoothly if you’ve maxed out of computer power over the years (I run XP pro on a 1.7ghz centrino platform from 2006, with 2gb of ram and a 160gb samsung IDE harddrive - it runs like a breeze for what it is).

But if you need to buy a new machine, it is optimized for windows 7 and that’s all you need. My wife just bought her first laptop, and I can really see the difference Windows 7 makes on a dual core I5 with 500gb or sata hard drive, an esata external port, fast wifi etc etc… I never thought 5gb could be transferred from an external HDD to and from the PC at the snap of a finger. Impressive stuff

or just as impressive as the latest Macbooks, etc etc…

So the choice is simple: if you love XP, then don’t buy a new computer, which in fact is not such a bad thing, since if it ain’t broken, why change it? It helps keep rubbish off the planet. Try to improve your machine the most you can instead, even if it doesnt look good pricewise, you’ll be doing the planet a favor, and even might help the computer market come down a bit… (why do people need to change machine every 3-4 years??? it’s ridiculous)

Personally I’m glad my laptop lasted so long and currently feels so fast. I’ll get a new one whenever I HAVE to, not whenever I WANT to. Beware of insidious marketing making you beleive that what you want is what you need. There’s a difference…

Ishan2010-10-07

@Brandon: You are right - they want our money. Everyone is aware of what you have mentioned. And my article is just questioning that approach.

Brandon Z2010-10-07

You write:
“Still, by some virtue infused in Microsoft by some stupid executive (probably on payrolls of Apple Google Firefox), Microsoft decided to remove support for XP in latest version of its free software.”

So the evil triad of Apple, Google, and Mozilla Foundation are secretly taking control over the otherwise benevolent Microsoft.

Get real. They just want your money. Microsoft is doing this so you’ll upgrade to Windows 7. Vista was such a load of crap that no one wanted to upgrade. Some people switched. Others decided XP was good enough, and stuck with it. Now they need a way to get people into the upgrade cycle again. They’ve released a half-decent OS in Windows 7, but as you point out the majority are sticking with XP, so by taking away IE 9 as an option for you on XP, they hope you’ll upgrade. And they hope their “free” software will therefore make them money. Anything “free” from Microsoft has strings attached: it’s only free if it causes you to use something else that you must pay for, or (in the case of free file viewers) if others use something that they must pay for (and therefore it helps Microsoft maintain their status as having the defacto standard in file formats).

Ishan2010-10-05

@Shitsita: I am not sure I would go to the extent of stop supporting Microsoft. I love Microsoft - don’t get me wrong. But I am only pissed by this stupid policy of not supporting XP.

Ishan2010-10-05

@leebert: I am using Linux also on my other laptop - It is Ubuntu netbook edition (working on a laptop, though), and I love it. Linux is really getting there, but there are still some things that basically can’t be done in Linux (like, something as simple as Netflix streaming is not supported yet).

leebert2010-10-04

Yeh, that’s what happens when you’re hooked on using proprietary software. How 'bout Firefox? Or Chrome, or Safari? (yes, Safari runs on Windows)

I’m a long time Windows user but transitioned over to Linux recently & found the transition fairly reasonable (with some exceptions). My home Linux distro is OpenSuSE but UbuntuMintSuperOS, SME OSCentOS are ready choices as well, esp. if you’re thinking of getting into any kind of cloud stuff. And Linux in the Amazon-like clouds is far superior to Windows, in both VM lease costs as well as spin-up time (2 minutes for Linux, 15 minutes for Windows VSI). You won’t see the new super-scalable open source databases on Windows like Tokyo Cabinet, Hadoop or Cassandra.

Linux brings many other advantages, some troubleshooting chores (audio on Linux can be a rough ride), but feel abandoned? I haven’t yet, I’m loving it, it’s helped reinvigorate my interest in systems again.

Shitsta2010-10-03

Ishan,

I think it’s time we users stop supporting Microsoft.

I am purchasing a Windows XP pro SP3 as we speak and I will get rid of Vista for Windows XP because of compatibility, speed, reliability and customization issues.

XP is small, fast, reliable and let’s me control everything to my taste and I can run Autocad 2000 with it. Vista is not for me and I don’t want windows 7.

Ishan2010-10-01

@Syd Bux: I appreciate your point of view. Let’s consider example of cars. If Toyota comes out with a new model of a car, how do they try to encourage people to switch to the new one? They try to tell people about advantages and features of the new car. They do not stop servicing the old car to switch people to new car.

I expect same from Microsoft - encourage me to switch to Windows 7 by telling me its merits, not by stopping support for XP.

Ishan2010-10-01

@Deborah: You are right - the cost of switching to Windows 7 is quite prohibitive for new users. In fact, it might make more sense to just get a new laptop or desktop that comes pre-installed with Windows 7. And your point about pirated software is right on target. Microsoft should provide a way to get OS for cheap - like using TrialPay to shave off some of the cost.
But instead of using all that, Microsoft is trying to switch users to Windows 7 by shutting down XP support to other products - that is outright foolish.

Powered by Waline v3.5.5